Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 11, 2025, 9:09 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1960s Sexual Revolution
#1
1960s Sexual Revolution
The so-called Sexual Revolution is something that conservative Christians have been railing against for years and blaming it for everything under the sun.

But what is the sexual revolution? I ask because I usually don't hear anything about it except from already mentioned lunatics. Is (was) this something real that happened in the 1960s or is just another moral panic? I mean, it all looks like an idiotic take on feminism, if you ask me.

To me, it seemed that sexual revolution was the time in the 50s when Kinsey showed up and people started talking about sex more and slowly becoming more understanding towards gays, masturbation, sex in general as something more than just procreation.
But then again, people have been talking about sex before, so maybe it's not even that.

Now let's turn to what sexual revolution is not or maybe it is, you tell me - that's why I opened this topic.

Looking in one of those books on the Amazon written by a Christian woman, sexual revolution is described as the moment when the contraceptive pill showed up which made women have irresponsible sex ("like men"). But, apparently, in doing this "dirty deed" women are actually suffering inside because they are not "designed" like men to just have a lot of sex with different partners (yes, men don't get blamed for being horny and having sex), but they want to be subdued by a man in marriage. Yes, the logic goes that if a woman chooses to have out of wedlock sex with several partners, she is doing it against her free will and is manipulated by men's fantasies, but if she chooses to be a housewife, who obeys husband's every order, she is not manipulated by men.

This sexual freedom (aka slavery to male sexual fantasies) is also, apparently, driving women to prostitution and pornography, only to make them frigid and not wanting to have kids. I'm sure it also somehow makes them into communists, too.

In reality, it is not independence that will drive women to prostitution, but patriarchy where they are kept uneducated as well as faced with miserable opportunities for employment, thus turning them to prostitution as only available work, since irresponsible daddies frequently don't provide. This is why there were many more prostitutes in the 19th century, and earlier, than today.

This is from forward in the book "The Case Against the Sexual Revolution" captured from Amazon just to see what I was referring to and as you'll see it's total ideology driven nonsense.


teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply
#2
RE: 1960s Sexual Revolution
Christian conservatives can’t bear the thought of people fucking without a license. Or, as H.L. Mencken put it, ‘Puritanism is the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, might be happy.’

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#3
RE: 1960s Sexual Revolution
A large part of the issue was the birth control pill.  The idea that women could perhaps control if they got pregnant or not scared the crap out of the patriarchy.  Women were not supposed to have that sort of control over their reproductive parts.  The issue of who is the father was to be controlled by men, not women and heaven forbid a woman want to have sex with someone for a reason other than procreation.

The churches that preached "Be fruitful and multiply" saw this as blasphemous.

The pill freed women to a certain extent and, of course, that was is seen as a bad thing.
Reply
#4
RE: 1960s Sexual Revolution
mmm... can't give women a choice, they might start thinking they were as good as men!!
The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.

Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!

Reply
#5
RE: 1960s Sexual Revolution
[Image: 200w.gif?cid=6c09b952xe2nbmvf00xx5eind0l...w.gif&ct=g]
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#6
RE: 1960s Sexual Revolution
Wait, wimmenfolk controlling their own cooch? When did this happen?!

Reply
#7
RE: 1960s Sexual Revolution
(February 19, 2025 at 11:54 am)arewethereyet Wrote: A large part of the issue was the birth control pill.  The idea that women could perhaps control if they got pregnant or not scared the crap out of the patriarchy.  Women were not supposed to have that sort of control over their reproductive parts.  The issue of who is the father was to be controlled by men, not women and heaven forbid a woman want to have sex with someone for a reason other than procreation.

The churches that preached "Be fruitful and multiply" saw this as blasphemous.

The pill freed women to a certain extent and, of course, that was is seen as a bad thing.

This threatened not just patriarchy, women having control over when and how many children they have threatened the avarice of the capital class as well. Can't maintain endless growth with a shrinking population.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Severe weather during the 1960s vorlon13 5 1092 May 3, 2018 at 3:07 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)