Natural Selection Seems Insufficient

[Ravenshire]

The very first post gives copy/paste vibes...

I'm sure their "argument" is the result of regurgitating something they heard/read online, didn't understand, and mistook for profound, but it doesn't seem to be a direct copy/pasta.

[Jal]

…or you might not know what atheism means?  People can believe in human agency without believing in gods.  Your own example of the dominos doesn’t seem to present any difference between a world with or without them.

Human agency? In a domino determinism? Not really. In a theistic or atheistic panpsychism? Yes.  Hopefully we agree on that point.

[Ravenshire]

You didn't make any cogent arguments. You flung some poo at the walls in hopes it would stick.

I'm not here to rebut your arguments you might accidentally make, they're self-rebutting. I'm here to point up how silly you look when making them.

None of my arguments were cogent? Then you should have easily refuted them. Fact is, you did no such thing.  Tell tale sign.

Yep. A tell-tale sign that we've seen/heard all the crap that flows from the religious and find it tedious, if sometimes unintentionally comic. There is rarely anything worthy of rebuttal, and that is especially the case with you.

[Jal]

The very first post gives copy/paste vibes...

I'm sure their "argument" is the result of regurgitating something they heard/read online, didn't understand, and mistook for profound, but it doesn't seem to be a direct copy/pasta.

You're sure I'm just regurgitating someone else's view?  Actually I formed my views before I ever heard the word panpsychism. 

But even I were just parroting someone else,  not sure why that's such a big deal. If you repeat/ regurgitate atheistic views, does that make you a fraud?

I'm really not sure what point you guys are trying to make here.  Doesn't seem relevant.

[Jal]

None of my arguments were cogent? Then you should have easily refuted them. Fact is, you did no such thing.  Tell tale sign.

Yep. A tell-tale sign that we've seen/heard all the crap that flows from the religious and find it tedious, if sometimes unintentionally comic. There is rarely anything worthy of rebuttal, and that is especially the case with you.

Telltale again. Seems this is par for the course.

[The Grand Nudger]

Have you considered whether or not gods actually explain human agency?

[Ravenshire]

I'm sure their "argument" is the result of regurgitating something they heard/read online, didn't understand, and mistook for profound, but it doesn't seem to be a direct copy/pasta.

You're sure I'm just regurgitating someone else's view?  Actually I formed my views before I ever heard the word panpsychism. 

But even I were just parroting someone else,  not sure why that's such a big deal. If you repeat/ regurgitate atheistic views, does that make you a fraud?

I'm really not sure what point you guys are trying to make here.  Doesn't seem relevant.

Actually, I spend about as much time in a year discussing my atheism as you've spent today trying to sell your version of christer insanity, whether it's your sweat-soaked fever dream or someone else's. If it's yours, my condolences. It shows a marked lack of imagination.

[Ravenshire]

Yep. A tell-tale sign that we've seen/heard all the crap that flows from the religious and find it tedious, if sometimes unintentionally comic. There is rarely anything worthy of rebuttal, and that is especially the case with you.

Telltale again. Seems this is par for the course.

And you simply cannot spit out an original sentence. Or, did Mr. Rodgers teach you that new word today and get you all excited to use it?

[Jal]

You're sure I'm just regurgitating someone else's view?  Actually I formed my views before I ever heard the word panpsychism. 

But even I were just parroting someone else,  not sure why that's such a big deal. If you repeat/ regurgitate atheistic views, does that make you a fraud?

I'm really not sure what point you guys are trying to make here.  Doesn't seem relevant.

Actually, I spend about as much time in a year discussing my atheism as you've spent today trying to sell your version of christer insanity, whether it's your sweat-soaked fever dream or someone else's. If it's yours, my condolences. It shows a marked lack of imagination.

You seem to write as if my posts have tried to convince the atheist reader to accept the Bible. If that's your insinutation it is a strawman intellectually dishonest.

I did no such thing.

[Jal]

On top of that, you haven't identified anything insane or unreasonable in my positoin.