For Tackattack

[colubridae]

I knew it was going to be lame.

Olber's paradox was not lame!

It's not my flawed logic. Fucked if I care.

[Shell B]

Olber's paradox was not lame!

It's not my flawed logic. Fucked if I care.

[colubridae]

I do recall somone on RDF had this little gem in their sights, but couldn't follow through with physical evidence.

Shame really.

[lilphil1989]

Now I'm being rude. It doesn't happen very often, but given all the effort you're putting into aggravating people, I wouldn't want to disappoint you .

[colubridae]

Now I'm being rude. It doesn't happen very often, but given all the effort you're putting into aggravating people, I wouldn't want to disappoint you .

I am truly sorry. Didn't mean to offend.

[eric209]

---

---

Now I'm being rude. It doesn't happen very often, but given all the effort you're putting into aggravating people, I wouldn't want to disappoint you .

how are you offended while not giving a fuck?

[frankiej]

@colubridae

You are definitely running the risk of people ignoring you... especially when you waste time going no where

[tackattack]

---

For tackatack


In an earlier thread I offered you some evidence supporting big G.

It concerns omnipotence.

The babble gives god the attribute almighty. Every theologian since whenever quotes this as omnipotence. As you know, this means the logical absurdity that god can bake a cake so large he can’t eat it.

Your arguments that god is all powerful as long as what he does is possible don’t hold water, and you know it. They are the merest semantic sophistry. Legerdemain.


I have genuine scientific evidence that will support full blown omnipotence.
(not proof – I’m scientific… so proof is not in my purview)


I can let you have it. The cost will be – your soul!
If you genuinely consider I’ve sold you a lemon then I will go to a church service! Twice!

With best regards Lucifer.

This is a genuine offer. AFAIK no-one else has spotted it.

---

I'd like to think I get to every single post in every single thread. If you want me specifically to respond to a thread, feel free to PM me as well, my PM box is a much more effecient was to reach me. Anywho:

Yes, all early theologans translate one of his attributes as "the Almighty"
as in all powerful. As in having the power to do something.
If something is a logical contradiction, then it isn't possible to do. Doing something necessitates that it can be done, therefore is logical.
ence my, God has the power (not can) do anything logically possible.
If you have genuine scientific evidence then present it. If not, stop making assertions you can't back up about what other people know or believe, it's quite pedantic.

[leo-rcc]

Hi Colubridae,

Please check this post on how the question you post is a loaded question. In the same forum you will also find the debate between ryft (then names Arcanus) and Saerules with the same loaded question in it.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-2080-pos...l#pid37364

[colubridae]

For what it’s worth. I meant no offence by any of this. And I have noted that other threads demonstrate game playing – with no condemnation.

Please understand that I am an atheist of the worst kind. I despise organised religion for the evil that it has done and continues to do. As far as I’m concerned no theist or deist is completely free of this taint. Christians and muslims especially have their hands soaked in the blood split by the kingdom of heaven, right up to their armpits.

That having been said, I consider myself to be intellectually honest. I’m sure you will disagree.

To the business at hand. You are as aware as I am that the word ‘omnipotence’ means what it says. Whatever word games you play, you cannot circumvent the ‘infinite’ connotation.

Whatever power you attribute to your god I can conjure up a god with greater power, unless, of course, your god has infinite power. Which leaves you with the same problem. Infinite is infinite.

The point of all this is that my evidence supports the ‘theory’ of an omnipotent god. Unfortunately I’m not inclined to simply reveal it. Lame as it may be, it’s still a tiny nugget of gold. And I certainly consider ‘demands’ that I give my evidence to be impertinent to the level of plain rudeness.

JC himself espoused patience and humility (according to which page of the big book of multiple choice you are turned to.).