Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 9, 2025, 3:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The love toward the unbelievers!
#51
RE: The love toward the unbelievers!
check Calvinistic baptists.. they're probably the biggest modern group. Some protestants are Calvinistic, not a lot that I'm aware of though. It would be the opposite part of the reformation to Lutheranism.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
#52
RE: The love toward the unbelievers!
Quote:my beliefs are pretty much in line with the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith.

Waldork - 322 years obsolete by his own admission!
Reply
#53
RE: The love toward the unbelievers!
(November 8, 2011 at 1:32 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:my beliefs are pretty much in line with the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith.

Waldork - 322 years obsolete by his own admission!

ROFLOL

Well done Waldork!! Well done!!

ROFLOL
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#54
RE: The love toward the unbelievers!
(November 7, 2011 at 11:09 pm)Ziploc Surprise Wrote: I still can't find any of your groups online that describe themselves as Reformed Christians.

Really?

http://monergism.com/
http://reformedaudio.org/
http://www.solidfoodmedia.com/
http://aomin.org/
http://www.desiringgod.org/
http://www.ligonier.org/
http://www.cmfnow.com/
http://www.spiritempoweredpreaching.com/
http://www.reformed.org/

Just for starters….



Quote: Piper is the only one that seems to come close. I read one of his books and came to the conclusion that he must have a telephone pole shoved up his butt.

Why would you say something like that?

(November 8, 2011 at 1:32 am)Minimalist Wrote: Waldork - 322 years obsolete by his own admission!

The old fallacious appeal to novelty rears its ugly head, I am still waiting for the day that you post something that is not logically fallacious. Still….waiting….

(November 8, 2011 at 1:54 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:


I’ll tell you what is actually well done, the fact you followed up Min’s logical fallacy with one of your own, fallacious appeal to ridicule. You two really are peas from the same irrational pod aren’t you?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How many strong assumptions do unbelievers need? Pizza 29 6256 April 1, 2015 at 7:49 am
Last Post: Brakeman
  The Unbelievers film Mudhammam 0 715 June 25, 2014 at 5:41 am
Last Post: Mudhammam
  "The Unbelievers" Dawkins and Krauss V. World Golbez 3 2217 June 14, 2013 at 2:18 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Why should we love love beyond what is necessary for gene survival? rybak303 1 1491 August 17, 2010 at 5:04 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)