Damned Republicunts

[account_inactive]

Also... don't say the "c" word when describing these men. It is so offensive

[The Valkyrie]

What do you think of the possibility of Trump as our President?

I hate to tell you but it appears that he will be the republican nominee and run against that old hag, Hillary Clinton.

Who do you think will beat him? Low energy Jeb!?

Also... don't say the "c" word when describing these men. It is so offensive

I find those "men" offensive.

If they would fuck off so as not to offend me, I'll stop calling them names.

[Wyrd of Gawd]

Rand Paul goes full-birther on Cruz.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/11/politics/r...tizenship/



When you are at less than 3% in the polls I guess you have to do something.

For all their huffing and puffing about how they are the Constitutional purists, conservative birthers don't seem to know jack shit about the document.

I can think of 1,001 reasons not to vote for Cruz, but his citizenship is not one of them.

So you think it's a good idea to vote for a commie Cuban Canadian posing as a Texan?

[Fake Messiah]

Ben Carson: If We Give Equal Rights to “Abnormal” LGBT People, “Say Goodbye to America”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5HZFKITiwk

[ApeNotKillApe]

Fucking scumbag.

[Minimalist]

Worse, he has become an irrelevant fucking scumbag.

[Minimalist]

I'm laughing my ass off, here.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/1-in-4-g...president/

1 in 4 GOP voters think Canada-born Ted Cruz is ineligible to serve as US president

Only 47 percent of all voters surveyed responded that they thought Cruz is qualified to be president with regard to his citizenship, with 26 percent saying they were not sure.

The poll was taken from Jan. 7 to Jan. 14, before questions about Cruz’s eligibility became one of the most heated moments of Thursday night’s Republican primary debate.

How come fucking jesus didn't clear up this little problem for you, Ted?

[Divinity]

Ted Cruz isn't qualified to be President, but it has fuck all to do with where he was born.

[GUBU]

Then surely you can find another way of obtaining it.   Especially since killing someone isn't likely to yield information, just as torturing someone isn't likely to yield information.

I just can't understand why you wouldn't allow torture to save peoples laves, but you would allow killing people to do so.  Why is waterboarding worse than killing someone?  What other way would you suggest to obtain the information from a hardened terrorist?

Would you throw a man off a bridge to prevent a train crash with massive loss of life (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem)? This is an issue which has been troubling psychologists for a long time. But it seems most people wouldn't kill a third party to save others, even if they would lay down their own lives.

[Minimalist]

Bill Maher returned from vacation and promptly called Ben Carson "a human screen saver."