I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?

[Jesster]

Has this progressed at all since I last posted here? It looks like this guy is still spinning.

[Primordial Bisque]

Has this progressed at all since I last posted here? It looks like this guy is still spinning.

None whatsoever. He is having issues moving to the next step in his script because we're not buying his proof.

[Cyberman]

Basically this

[Primordial Bisque]

Well, Simon, you are obviously evading to answer my challenge to you to go into objective reality of existence to contemplate your papa and mama causing you to come to existence and life - see ANNEX below in bold.

So, when you do not do this contemplation, I do not reply or more correctly react at all to your further posting here.

For the rest of atheists and everyone else, do the same contemplation, and then let us talk about causation.

Otherwise, as there are all kinds of atheists in the internet with their self-identification of the kind they belong to, perhaps some enterprising web surfer will start a website with the name, The Unrealistic Atheists: because these atheists don't do nothing in the objective reality of existence, like contemplating how their papa and mama caused them to have come to existence and life, they just stick to working out inside their brain err mind, with manipulation of words and concepts, and feeling so smug with having explained away, to their vacuous satisfaction, the existence of God, without so much as stepping into the reality of existence outside their brain err mind.

*bold is mine*

I've noticed that you repeatedly use phrases like "go forth into objective reality outside of the concepts in your mind", or similar statements. What do you mean by that? Do you use objective reality as a tool for rationalizing what's in your mind?

If I based a concept off of the old folklore that faeries lived in mushroom rings, and I encountered a mushroom ring in objective reality, is it safe for me to assume that faeries exist?

[Whateverist]

Well I'm not up for bitch slapping him tonight. I'll leave it to my capable colleagues.

[Astreja]

For the rest of atheists and everyone else, do the same contemplation, and then let us talk about causation.

I've contemplated your posts and concluded that you have no credible empirical evidence for your alleged god.  Without that evidence, it's pointless to talk about causation because no causative agent has been identified yet.

[GUBU]

I'm just wondering why you felt it so important to emphasise your warning level.

I'm guessing he's been banned elsewhere for spamming the same post the whole time.

[Mariosep]

Dear atheists, I find proving God is so simple, and I show it simple in my OP, click on page 1 to read my proof in the OP; here I will summarize it quickly:

I posit the concept of God, namely, in concept God is first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

With the concept in my mind I proceed to the objective reality of existence and I find countless instances of causation.

All of the instances of causation are evidence of God's presence and action.

Therefore God exists as the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning – the evidence shows it to be so.

To prove God exists is as simple as proving the nail has an inventor, I mean the nail that we hammer on to bind two pieces of wood together, that it has an inventor – of course if you will, we can talk also about the nail in our fingers and toes.

Proving God exists is also simple with us knowing  that babies are caused by their papas and mamas, and that fact brings the intelligent mind of man to infer ultimately to the existence and action of God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

Okay, atheists, starting with Simon Moon, why do you find it so difficult or even impossible?

Try proving that the nail has an inventor, you find that difficult or even impossible?

Try it, I challenge all of you atheists: all you have to do is to know that the nail is not self-made, but it was invented by an entity with intelligence - as simple as that.


Okay, tell me why you find it so difficult and even impossible to prove God exists.

[chimp3]

Dear atheists, I find proving God is so simple, and I show it simple in my OP, click on page 1 to read my proof in the OP; here I will summarize it quickly:

I posit the concept of God, namely, in concept God is first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

With the concept in my mind I proceed to the objective reality of existence and I find countless instances of causation.

All of the instances of causation are evidence of God's presence and action.

Therefore God exists as the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning – the evidence shows it to be so.

To prove God exists is as simple as proving the nail has an inventor, I mean the nail that we hammer on to bind two pieces of wood together, that it has an inventor – of course if you will, we can talk also about the nail in our fingers and toes.

Proving God exists is also simple with us knowing  that babies are caused by their papas and mamas, and that fact brings the intelligent mind of man to infer ultimately to the existence and action of God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

Okay, atheists, starting with Simon Moon, why do you find it so difficult or even impossible?

Try proving that the nail has an inventor, you find that difficult or even impossible?

Try it, I challenge all of you atheists: all you have to do is to know that the nail is not self-made, but it was invented by an entity with intelligence - as simple as that.


Okay, tell me why you find it so difficult and even impossible to prove God exist?

Nails were invented by people and so was your concept of god.

[I_am_not_mafia]

Okay, tell me why you find it so difficult and even impossible to prove God exists.

Sure. After you explain to us why it is so difficult for you to read and understand what we are telling you.