Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 12, 2024, 7:40 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lighter Skin = Better?
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 13, 2013 at 12:24 pm)Chas Wrote:
(July 11, 2013 at 5:46 pm)cratehorus Wrote: guns germs and steel is a book that simply furthers the racist theory of enviromental determinism and can be considered quite racist as it's conclusion is the same as the OP that lighter skin societies are better and it's because of the enviroment and "here's why"..... the truth is societies with the smallest/defunct male genitalia are the most inherently violent and therefore focus more on developing technology and killing eachother rather than lying in sun eating and having sex any alien intelligent lifebeing would easily say darker skin is far more "civilized"

That's whacked. How is having a favored environment racist? Thinking

I think it's the book the posits that whites 'evolved' in environments suitable for pack animals, and thus it put them in a higher position.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 10, 2013 at 8:17 pm)festive1 Wrote: So much facepalm.

Indeed.

However it can't be ignored that politically and religiously, african and arab countries lag well behind.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.

Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 13, 2013 at 12:48 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:
(July 13, 2013 at 12:24 pm)Chas Wrote: That's whacked. How is having a favored environment racist? Thinking

I think it's the book the posits that whites 'evolved' in environments suitable for pack animals, and thus it put them in a higher position.

Well, no, it doesn't say that.

It's not about human biological evolution, it's about societies, technology, economics, and politics.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 13, 2013 at 1:00 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Indeed.

However it can't be ignored that politically and religiously, african and arab countries lag well behind.

Arabs are technically white. If by white you mean caucasian. They also occupy the "fertile crescent" which was the cradle of civilization.

The Middle East was actually pretty much on the cutting edge of human civilization waaaay back in the day until Islam crept in and completely retarded their culture.
Everything I needed to know about life I learned on Dagobah.
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 13, 2013 at 2:02 pm)Chas Wrote: It's not about human biological evolution, it's about societies, technology, economics, and politics.

that's why I put 'evolved' in quotes.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
"I'm not being racist but"

As someone else said, cultural influences, and the societal differentiations that have evolved from said influences would be one major cause of advancement occurring at different phases and at different speeds.

I think people need to start looking past the whole racial divide 'we're more evolved' bollocks and start looking at one we can advance humanity as a whole, in its entirety. The issues we face on earth will be global ones in the future, so we need to act globally to combat them.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 13, 2013 at 12:24 pm)Chas Wrote:
(July 11, 2013 at 5:46 pm)cratehorus Wrote: guns germs and steel is a book that simply furthers the racist theory of enviromental determinism and can be considered quite racist as it's conclusion is the same as the OP that lighter skin societies are better and it's because of the enviroment and "here's why"..... the truth is societies with the smallest/defunct male genitalia are the most inherently violent and therefore focus more on developing technology and killing eachother rather than lying in sun eating and having sex any alien intelligent lifebeing would easily say darker skin is far more "civilized"

That's whacked. How is having a favored environment racist? Thinking

"having" a different enviroment isn't racist stating europeans are "better" human beings and here's why or answering "why are europeans better people" with a detailed analysis and an attempt in sound reasoning is.........many conservative writers even admit enviromental determism is very racist

.........again white people have tiny penises and have too fight and kill all other races because of this....... they are by far not peace loving........ if i killed everyone in my neighborhood and stole all their stuff am i more civilized? because of that act? no........ so why are white people?....... they are the most murderous degenerate race to ever exist
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
[clap clap]

Three cheers for the anti-white racist. :rolling eyes:
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 14, 2013 at 4:32 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: [clap clap]

Three cheers for the anti-white racist. :rolling eyes:

"anti white racist"......... seriously you dumb ass bitch? thats like saying im a racist but i love very single other race except black people... why don't you quit trying too defend white people and realize the massive amounts of colonialsim didn't come from africa, the fact that one of the worlds most popular languages is english isn't because of india.................... and except that white's as a race are more muderous than anyone else.....white supremacists like this fact and say they are simply the "best" at murder....are you one of those people???? it's okay if you are
Reply
RE: Lighter Skin = Better?
(July 13, 2013 at 2:30 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: I think people need to start looking past the whole racial divide 'we're more evolved' bollocks and start looking at one we can advance humanity as a whole, in its entirety. The issues we face on earth will be global ones in the future, so we need to act globally to combat them.

Well, so what?

Is the pattern incorrect or not?
The only freedom, is freedom from illusion.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is republic better than monarchy? FlatAssembler 18 1106 September 13, 2022 at 12:03 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Christianity as religious institution in politics over islamic is sadly almost better Kimba02 3 339 April 11, 2019 at 6:55 am
Last Post: Succubus
  Ivanka insulting the mothers of all immigrants, or better: all immigrants. WinterHold 22 2343 May 31, 2018 at 8:31 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Laws Are No Better Than The Fuckheads Who Enforce Them Minimalist 2 639 April 3, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  We'd Be Better Off With The Taliban In Charge Minimalist 2 1464 April 20, 2017 at 4:55 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Top 10 Reasons Why Palin Would Make a Better President Than Trump YahwehIsTheWay 3 1006 April 18, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Who is the better first lady? Michelle Obama or Melania Trump ErGingerbreadMandude 62 9163 January 24, 2017 at 12:03 am
Last Post: Cecelia
  Better Hurry Up With That Wall, Drumpfucks. Minimalist 1 661 November 12, 2016 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: abaris
  What can you tell me to make it feel better? Whateverist 44 6445 November 10, 2016 at 12:44 am
Last Post: Tiberius
  I Guess This Makes It All Better Minimalist 8 1486 August 10, 2016 at 12:20 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)