Pro-life atheists

[Losty]

I already have. You are fucking delusional.

You demolished it? You are fucking delusional.

Great minds...lol :p

[Chas]

Not being able to survive on your own is not the same thing as not being able to survive if someone cuts you open and starts removing shit from your body that you need.

It is the same, You are dependent on other organism(s). You are not viable as an individual.

Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell.
Do you honestly think that anyone else accepts that as a correct definition of viable?

You are just like the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

[Losty]

Not being able to survive on your own is not the same thing as not being able to survive if someone cuts you open and starts removing shit from your body that you need.

It is the same, You are dependent on other organism(s). You are not viable as an individual.

Grow up. No one is this stupid. You are intentionally being dishonest because you hate being wrong.

---

---

I think its important that human beings be prevented from killing other human beings....but that is just my whacked out conserve-tard opinion.

How have you been here this long and still don't understand that an assertion of what something is, is not the same thing as demonstrating that?

If I was happy enough to argue like you do my position would begin and end at "I think it's important that people have the right to abort fetuses, as fetuses are alien Cthulhu monsters that tear out your soul when they're born. But that's just my whacked out, anti-Elder Godist opinion."

Oh! And that makes the fourth time you've equivocated about "human beings" versus "people" under your own definitions! By now it's gone well beyond an honest mistake and into the intentional dishonesty territory.

---

*Heywood plugs his ears* nana nana I'm not listening

[Minimalist]

..but that is just my whacked out conserve-tard opinion

Possibly the first honest comment you've ever made, Woodie.

[Heywood]

It is the same, You are dependent on other organism(s). You are not viable as an individual.

Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell.
Do you honestly think that anyone else accepts that as a correct definition of viable?

You are just like the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable.

[Chas]

Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell.
Do you honestly think that anyone else accepts that as a correct definition of viable?

You are just like the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable.

You have backed yourself into a corner here, BlowJob.

Be honest, admit you are wrong, and move on.

[Losty]

Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell.
Do you honestly think that anyone else accepts that as a correct definition of viable?

You are just like the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable.

Well....we are guilty of using the actual definition instead of making up our own, if that's what you mean.

[Heywood]

The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable.

You have backed yourself into a corner here, BlowJob.

Be honest, admit you are wrong, and move on.

Wrong about what? Viability as a rationale to determine which human beings can be killed and which can't is nonsense. None of us are viable.

[Losty]

You have backed yourself into a corner here, BlowJob.

Be honest, admit you are wrong, and move on.

Wrong about what? Viability as a rationale to determine which human beings can be killed and which can't is nonsense. None of us are viable.

It's getting a little pathetic Heywood. Be a grown up, admit that you're being dishonest about the definition of viability, and go back to one of your other ridiculous arguments. I for one quite enjoyed the whole abortion is never necesarry to save a woman's life because I don't believe that argument.

[Heywood]

The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable.

Well....we are guilty of using the actual definition instead of making up our own, if that's what you mean.

A time will come when a human being can be conceived and develop all the way into adulthood without the need of a mother. The notion of viability outside the womb is arbitrary and becoming more and more meaningless.

---

It's getting a little pathetic Heywood. Be a grown up, admit that you're being dishonest about the definition of viability, and go back to one of your other ridiculous arguments. I for one quite enjoyed the whole abortion is never necesarry to save a woman's life because I don't believe that argument.

You still haven't provided one case where a late term abortion was the only option. That lady you says knows of cases but can't tell us because of patient privacy is BS argument. She doesn't need to tell us who the patient is/was.....all she needs to do is say this specific condition cannot be treated except via a late term abortion.