RE: Is consensual Homosex is not Wrong? If so, Why is consensual Bestiality wrong?
November 23, 2015 at 12:23 pm
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2015 at 12:42 pm by Kingpin.)
(November 23, 2015 at 5:47 am)Shaddam IV Wrote:(November 23, 2015 at 5:41 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Consensual homosexuality is not wrong, by definition. Consensual bestiality is not possible.
When you have a spare minute from trolling, look up the definition of 'consensual'.
Boru
Liar. You're in denial. Animals are known to hump anything and everything when they get the urge. A lot of them try to hump humans. Here's a **compilation** of Dog's trying to fuck a girl. There are so many videos on youtube of animals having interspecies sex from cats, to goats to even humans. We flagged them all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etthVXuOSgw
If you say animal consent doesn't exist now, you are CLEARLY in denial because your "pwecious wittle homo" degeneracy means a lot to you
(November 23, 2015 at 5:45 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: If killing an animal is not wrong, then why killing a human is wrong? You either accept both, or you reject both as wrong. Otherwise, you have double standards, quite obvious, (and you know it too but won't admit it)That's exactly why I'm against Animal abuse genius. I'm vegetarian too.
Animals are animals, humans are humans. Animals don't consent to sh*t. Sometimes we need double standards, because we're talking about two different things.
However, if you want to smear peanut butter on your genitals and have your dog consensually lick it off - hey, who am I to judge? Whatever keeps you from procreating...
And you are aware that in the animal world "humping" is also a sign of dominance right? Not just for sex. Alpha females will also hump to show their dominance and since they are female that "humping" has nothing to do with sex
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
