Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 10, 2024, 2:52 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"The first person to live to [200, 300, 500, 1000] has already been born"
#83
RE: "The first person to live to [200, 300, 500, 1000] has already been born"
(December 14, 2015 at 3:22 pm)Amine Wrote:
(December 14, 2015 at 7:55 am)excitedpenguin Wrote: You can't really say it's bigoted since everyone is going to have to get old at some point. That's why it concerns all of us though.

But the matter is about finding a technology that would change the fact that everyone is going to get old at some point. By analogy, what if it were legal to abuse and kill people over 85 years old, simply because they are old? That's not how it works. Murder is murder because people are people. Many have made their principles clear in saying they think it is right for people to die when they are old, despite the current lack of practical application.

(December 14, 2015 at 10:10 am)excitedpenguin Wrote: Nice essay, I liked it. One thing, though. Don't be so dismissive of A.I. I recommend you read the book Superintelligence by Nick Bostrom.

Thanks. I've read and listen to some stuff by Bostrom (and others in his camp) but I'm still fairly agnostic about AI. Another good viewpoint is elucidated here by David Deutsch: https://aeon.co/essays/how-close-are-we-...telligence

Excerpt: "I do not highlight all these philosophical issues because I fear that AGIs will be invented before we have developed the philosophical sophistication to understand them and to integrate them into civilisation. It is for almost the opposite reason: I am convinced that the whole problem of developing AGIs is a matter of philosophy, not computer science or neurophysiology, and that the philosophical progress that is essential to their future integration is also a prerequisite for developing them in the first place."
1. I know. That's why I said it concerns all of us. There's no disagreement here, just a misunderstanding, except for the part where you wrongly said that it's bigoted to say that of old people. It's not. As things are, unless we change that, we'll all get to be old, and so the idiots who dismiss the death of old people as less important are really talking about their own too, ultimately.

So you're saying you read his book, then? If not, do read it. It's more than worth your time, I assure you.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: "The first person to live to [200, 300, 500, 1000] has already been born" - by Excited Penguin - December 14, 2015 at 3:50 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  On the consciousness of a new born baby Macoleco 8 875 April 7, 2022 at 7:22 am
Last Post: brewer
  Live stream from 2000m depth - now - Alex K 15 2060 March 12, 2016 at 2:26 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Halucigenia Worm of 500 MYA Had Circular Mouth Secular Elf 3 1261 June 29, 2015 at 11:17 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Churches oppose three-person baby plan zebo-the-fat 36 7028 February 3, 2015 at 2:50 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Half Sheep half Goat born in Ireland downbeatplumb 11 2286 April 5, 2014 at 8:37 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Are you born with your personality? Clueless Morgan 18 4557 March 18, 2014 at 10:55 am
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  We've been using tools longer than we thought... Creed of Heresy 6 2925 December 18, 2013 at 9:42 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Next-Gen Test Tube Baby Born pineapplebunnybounce 4 2428 July 12, 2013 at 4:46 pm
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce
Smile World’s First GM Babies Born Big Blue Sky 12 3752 June 28, 2013 at 10:01 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
Lightbulb Monsanto Has Been Removed And Banned By: Big Blue Sky 40 10003 June 26, 2013 at 11:46 am
Last Post: HAL9000



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)