RE: "The first person to live to [200, 300, 500, 1000] has already been born"
December 14, 2015 at 8:11 pm
(This post was last modified: December 14, 2015 at 8:12 pm by Excited Penguin.)
Actually, scratch that. It doesn't make any sense.
It would become risky when we're approaching a phase where any newborns couldn't be fed due to the lack of resources. So any child born in that world would have to instantly die, thus procreating one would be the same as murdering it later on.
It would become risky when we're approaching a phase where any newborns couldn't be fed due to the lack of resources. So any child born in that world would have to instantly die, thus procreating one would be the same as murdering it later on.