(December 25, 2015 at 8:23 pm)Jenny A Wrote:(December 24, 2015 at 4:32 am)Delicate Wrote: That's asserted but not demonstrated.
For all their bravado atheists here never get off the ground with demonstrating the truth of their claims. I'd love to see that change.
Your missed the point. I don't believe Socrates is immortal. I gave you an example of an arguement which is invalid because its premese is unsubstantiated. No reliance can be placed on the conclusion regardless of the logical soundness of any argument that folows there from. In my example the logic is sound, but the premise is not.
Similarly, in your arguments for god you often begin with faulty premise.
Surely, you can't be as obtuse as you pretend. Your are either responding without thinking or trolling.
As to demonstrating that there is no god, I don't pretend to do that. It is an undemonstrable claim if God is defined so as to be unfalsafible. What I can do is repeat that there is no credible evidenice for a god. Providing credible evidence of god is the theists job, not that of atheists.
If you really don't get this, try to disprove the existence of unicorns. Is the fact you can't proof of unicorns? It is not. The same is true of any god claim.
You still have to explain which premise is faulty and why. You can't just arbitrarily declare the premise faulty because you're an atheist and don't want to accept arguments for God.
You're still missing a defense of your claim.
