(January 14, 2016 at 3:46 pm)Jenny A Wrote:(January 14, 2016 at 3:32 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Ok so there is no right or wrong answer regarding value. Then you say:Because that is my subjective opinion. At least I realize it's subjective. That's important. Can you tell the difference?
Why do you think it's right if there is nothing to which you can show error (per your words)?
This is the crux of the issue. You value of Hitler is the negative scale, in the minuses, right? But you say has none what so ever, it's determined by what people assign to him. The issue is why do people assign to him a value in the first place? You said you think your opinion of him being awful is right. Now let's discuss this, why do you think your opinion is right? And why do you have that opinion?
I'm trying to understand. To me, it seems he is awful only because he ought to not have been like that. There is more valuable ways he ought to have lived his life and there is ways we negatively condemn (opposite to valuing or negative value) by believing it's truly negative, condemned or evil.
I know it's your subjective opinion. I'm ask why you hold that? You don't believe he is actually bad but just think he is bad and hold that opinion is right. Seems contradictory to me. So perhaps explain.
