Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 10, 2024, 7:59 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The nature of evidence
#61
RE: The nature of evidence
(May 2, 2016 at 7:09 pm)Wryetui Wrote:
(May 2, 2016 at 6:43 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Those are facts, correct. Nothing that you said after that are justified conclusions deriving from those facts.

The only way a completely orderless universe could exist would be by the intervention of an immensely powerful entity, because complete lack of order is an order in itself; truly chaotic systems always contain some degree of order. Order observably comes from chaos. And I will point out that there seems to be a LOT of disorder mixed in with the order you observe; why would there be any disorder at all in a handcrafted world?

It does take a mind to recognize that 'order is orderly'. It does not follow that a mind is required for order to exist; though I think one could make a case that a mind would be necessary for no order at all to exist. If there were no humans to observe how orderly their world is, it would still be orderly. A tree that falls in the woods with no one to hear still causes vibrations in the air.

To me, your reasoning seems to be going:

A. Facts.
B. I feel like order has to come from somewhere and the only kind of somewhere it can come from is a superior mind.
C. Therefore, Superior mind.

B is your feelings and intuitions. Your feelings are not evidence of anything outside your head. Reality is under no obligation to conform to your expectations. Even if it was sound to base your conclusion off B, the set of possible minds that could be proposed that satisfy C is potentially infinite, and all but one of those possibilities must be wrong. If you're trying to get to God, you would still need to show why your choice is the true one. The odds of you being right by chance approach zero very closely.
It is interesting, but I do not entirely agree. I do not agree that order can come from disorder. That is, imagine you go to the beach and you find this on the shore:

[Image: help-word-written-stones-sandy-beach-37283062.jpg]

You conclude this is ordered. You would never think that this comes from disorder, how could it? For that to happen disorder must know english and its propper grammar, disorder must also know how to choose the right rocks of a suitable weight, color and shape, but this belongs to order, not to disorder. If you found that same picture on the beach would you conclude it has been brought up by disorder, that it formed accidentally?
Coming up on the next episode of "theists at AF!" - A Christian's disastrous failure to grasp the fundamental concepts of evolution.  

Yeah...I know.  It's a re-run.   Dodgy
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 1, 2016 at 8:19 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 1, 2016 at 9:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 1, 2016 at 9:08 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 1, 2016 at 9:20 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 1, 2016 at 9:30 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 1, 2016 at 10:49 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 1, 2016 at 10:55 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Minimalist - May 1, 2016 at 11:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 3:12 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 2, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 2, 2016 at 12:41 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 12:49 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 3:54 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 4:23 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 4:35 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 4:59 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 5:00 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ravenshire - May 2, 2016 at 4:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 2, 2016 at 6:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 5:03 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 6:00 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 7:55 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Alex K - May 2, 2016 at 6:07 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mudhammam - May 2, 2016 at 6:24 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Alex K - May 2, 2016 at 6:38 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 8:06 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mudhammam - May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 6:27 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mudhammam - May 4, 2016 at 7:37 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by downbeatplumb - May 2, 2016 at 12:28 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 3:51 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 8:00 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 8:20 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 3:52 pm
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 8:26 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 8:29 am
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 8:36 am
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 12:45 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 2, 2016 at 12:46 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Joods - May 2, 2016 at 1:01 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 3:01 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 3:28 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 6:06 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 6:43 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 2, 2016 at 7:09 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRealJoeFish - May 2, 2016 at 7:46 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 2, 2016 at 7:52 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 9:35 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ravenshire - May 3, 2016 at 10:18 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 10:46 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 2, 2016 at 8:20 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 2, 2016 at 8:48 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Minimalist - May 2, 2016 at 3:35 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Minimalist - May 2, 2016 at 3:59 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 4:07 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by brewer - May 2, 2016 at 4:08 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 2, 2016 at 6:07 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 2, 2016 at 6:50 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - May 2, 2016 at 7:13 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 2, 2016 at 8:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 3, 2016 at 4:47 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 3, 2016 at 11:05 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 3, 2016 at 12:14 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by GUBU - May 5, 2016 at 2:19 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by drfuzzy - May 2, 2016 at 7:59 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 2, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 2, 2016 at 10:51 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 2, 2016 at 11:25 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 1:35 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 1:41 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 1:49 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 1:57 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 3, 2016 at 1:53 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 3, 2016 at 1:53 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 1:57 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 2:05 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 2:14 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 2:21 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 2:27 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 2:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 3, 2016 at 2:37 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 4:57 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 3, 2016 at 8:30 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 3, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by abaris - May 3, 2016 at 1:24 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 3, 2016 at 3:48 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 3, 2016 at 7:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 10:25 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2016 at 11:33 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ApeNotKillApe - May 3, 2016 at 3:55 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by The Valkyrie - May 3, 2016 at 3:56 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Wryetui - May 3, 2016 at 6:18 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 3, 2016 at 7:28 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ravenshire - May 3, 2016 at 10:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 4, 2016 at 12:03 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 12:22 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 4, 2016 at 12:41 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 12:50 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by The Valkyrie - May 4, 2016 at 3:17 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Angrboda - May 4, 2016 at 4:58 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 4, 2016 at 8:25 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2016 at 11:38 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 5, 2016 at 12:10 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by GUBU - May 5, 2016 at 6:21 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 3, 2016 at 10:52 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 10:41 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Jackalope - May 4, 2016 at 11:10 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 12:00 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Redbeard The Pink - May 4, 2016 at 1:10 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 10:15 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - May 3, 2016 at 7:49 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 3, 2016 at 9:10 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 3, 2016 at 11:12 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 9:25 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 4, 2016 at 11:07 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 10:31 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 3, 2016 at 10:16 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 2:15 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by bennyboy - May 4, 2016 at 2:17 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 2:23 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 2:34 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 4, 2016 at 3:10 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 3:24 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by The Valkyrie - May 4, 2016 at 7:05 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 4, 2016 at 7:35 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 4, 2016 at 11:16 am
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 4, 2016 at 12:24 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by RoadRunner79 - May 4, 2016 at 12:47 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 12:49 pm
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 4, 2016 at 12:57 pm
The nature of evidence - by LadyForCamus - May 4, 2016 at 1:00 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 1:04 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 4, 2016 at 1:01 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by TheRocketSurgeon - May 4, 2016 at 1:09 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 4, 2016 at 1:15 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 4, 2016 at 3:33 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 4, 2016 at 9:22 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by robvalue - May 5, 2016 at 2:34 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 5, 2016 at 8:18 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2016 at 12:18 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Edwardo Piet - May 5, 2016 at 12:44 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 5, 2016 at 2:06 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 5, 2016 at 3:37 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by abaris - May 5, 2016 at 5:38 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by GUBU - May 5, 2016 at 6:29 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Ben Davis - May 5, 2016 at 5:26 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 5, 2016 at 8:22 pm
RE: The nature of evidence - by Cyberman - May 6, 2016 at 5:53 am
RE: The nature of evidence - by ignoramus - May 6, 2016 at 6:21 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Video Neurosurgeon Provides Evidence Against Materialism Guard of Guardians 41 4724 June 17, 2019 at 10:40 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 12599 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Testimony is Evidence RoadRunner79 588 121149 September 13, 2017 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: Astonished
  The Nature Of Truth WisdomOfTheTrees 5 1104 February 21, 2017 at 5:30 am
Last Post: Sal
  The Dogma of Human Nature WisdomOfTheTrees 15 2667 February 8, 2017 at 7:40 pm
Last Post: WisdomOfTheTrees
  Is the statement "Claims demand evidence" always true? Mudhammam 268 34043 February 3, 2017 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: WisdomOfTheTrees
  Anecdotal Evidence RoadRunner79 395 55992 December 14, 2016 at 2:53 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 13064 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Witness Evidence RoadRunner79 248 37745 December 17, 2015 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence RoadRunner79 184 31178 November 13, 2015 at 12:17 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)