RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
July 4, 2016 at 4:07 am
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2016 at 4:08 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(July 4, 2016 at 4:04 am)Alex K Wrote:(July 4, 2016 at 4:02 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: The emotion contained within the analogy does not discredit the analogy. Limiting freedom should be emotional too, after all, should it not?
I did acknowledge her point. She thinks limiting freedoms for both sexes is fair because then both sexes are equally discriminated against. As I have been trying to explain, discriminating against both sexes instead of one is twice as unfair. I've been addressing the point the whole time.
This may be arguing semantics, but is "discrimination against both sexes" a thing?
Probably not. I worded that badly. Yeah it's semantics. I'll rephrase: Limiting both sexes' freedoms and therefore limiting the freedoms of about twice as many people is about twice as bad as limiting the freedom of one sex.
I paraphrase myself and reiterate so many times to try and get the point across I often end up ballsing up by saying something that doesn't make sense, lol. It doesn't discredit all the times I said it correctly though
