A Necessary Being?

[Arkilogue]

So we're talking about the 'singularity' then? The proposed 'concentration' of all universal matter/energy & space/time? Given we don't comprehend the state of the universe before Plank time, how can we possibly describe, with such confidence, the necessities of that state? Further, we don't know if other 'worlds/universes' actually exist so how can we do more than postulate the attributes, let alone the necessities? And I'm assuming there that necessities could apply to those other possible worlds; I can imagine universes which exist with neither matter/energy nor time/space (e.g. proposed quantum potential universes) where substance is not an applicable attribute. The necessities of those could not possibly be anything like those of universes similar to our own.

As for first cause, if we can neither describe the state of the universe before Plank time or the cause of universal expansion, how can you so positively assert that the consequence was cavitation? I mean, you may be working on the cutting edge of both quantum & cosmological physics here and maybe I'm woefully under-informed but there are a lot of barriers to acceptance of your statements.

The point here is that since it's nigh-on impossible to accurately define 'necessary' or 'being' and almost equally difficult to describe what triggered the expansion of our universe, nothing you've said brings us any closer to an honest proposition of a theistic god (e.g. Yahweh, Brahma, Ymir, Zeus, Aten...).

Yes.
How does one's level of comprehension change, and can it change?
Sure you can imagine it, but can you support it with a predictive model? The Many Worlds magical bingo machine theory sure is an attractive one....till you realize it's infinite special pleading.

The exact mechanism is still undefined because no one is imagining the beginning singularity in this manner, so in lieu of even handful of people that are comfortable contemplating an extant infinity that is trillions of times hotter and denser than anything they are familiar with, I am using known scientific processes that resemble the process

So far those lab repeatable processes are sono-luminescence by sonic cavitation and crystal nucleation.

http://www.iflscience.com/chemistry/turn...instantly/

veryone knows that water freezes at 0 °C - or does it? When water freezes, it needs a nucleus in order for the solid crystals to form and become ice. Water is typically full of particles and impurities which have no problem kicking off the crystallization process. However, purified water by definition doesn’t have those impurities. With nothing for the water molecules to latch onto, purified water can be supercooled as far as -40°C.

For the purposes of your at-home experiment, the water doesn’t need to be cooled that far. In just under 3 hours, the bottles of water have been chilled to -24 °C (-11 °F). Of course, individual settings on freezers will likely alter the time and temperature it will take to supercool the water.

The energy generated from firm hit on the side of the bottle forces the supercooled water molecules to form a crystal in a process called nucleation. That nucleus ice crystal is all that’s needed to start a chain reaction of crystallization throughout the entire bottle. Shaking or jostling the bottle has the same effect, so be very careful and have a steady hand when removing the water from your freezer.


In the Infinite Fermi liquid substance, there is no edge to the bottle.


And guess what....after I had worked out the model, after I watched example of crystal nucleation, after I put the two together....I did a little search and found this: http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewconten...xt=physics

For more than two decades there have been studies of the
nucleation of bubbles during the QCD phase transition
(QCDPT), the transition from a universe of deconfined
gluons, quarks and antiquarks (the quark/gluon plasma)
to a hadronic universe.


There are many more scholarly articles exploring the same possibility


I'm not just whistling quantum Dixie. I'm just entering the universe from the opposite direction.