RE: William Lane Craig denies the number zero.
October 22, 2016 at 10:26 am
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2016 at 10:27 am by Edwardo Piet.)
WLC is making a use/mention error.
The number zero obviously exists.. What it represents is nothingness and nothingness is the quality of nothing and is therefore nothing and therefore doesn't exist. So there is "zero" but there is no zeroness. The number zero obviously exists so he's simply mistaken due to his error.
Can't say I'm surprised he's committing a form of the equivocation fallacy (the use/mention error in this case) he does it all the fucking time.
The number zero obviously exists.. What it represents is nothingness and nothingness is the quality of nothing and is therefore nothing and therefore doesn't exist. So there is "zero" but there is no zeroness. The number zero obviously exists so he's simply mistaken due to his error.
Can't say I'm surprised he's committing a form of the equivocation fallacy (the use/mention error in this case) he does it all the fucking time.