(February 9, 2017 at 3:15 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote:The "non-overlapping" bit implies comparison to me. The fact that religion is based on lies makes a comparison to science ridiculous.(February 9, 2017 at 1:42 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Elephants and hamsters are both animals. No Overlapping Magisteria there too. Ridiculous comparison there too. Religion is based on wishfulness and fiction.
Noma doesn’t compare science and religion. Noma is about scientists going along with theists who say there is no conflict between science and their respective holy book.
What it does is give theists sole jurisdiction over matters like morals, purpose and religious “truth.” While giving scientists sole jurisdiction over physical matters.
This sounds reasonable on the surface, but it forgets that theists base their teachings on books that claim to know god’s actions in the physical world. since science can’t disprove the existence of go, scientists have nothing to say about how the world works through the eyes of a believer.
Parents can let their children die of curable diseases by praying over them instead of taking them to a doctor. But it’s outside the scope of science to run controlled studies disproving the efficacy of prayer.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 12, 2024, 11:46 pm
Thread Rating:
Noma (Non Overlapping Magisteria)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
An intro to my non-materialist view | Bunburryist | 34 | 7335 |
June 3, 2017 at 9:40 pm Last Post: Amarok |
|
Scientific arguments for eating Organic/non-GMO food? | CapnAwesome | 15 | 4226 |
June 10, 2015 at 6:49 pm Last Post: Pyrrho |
|
Non-overlapping magesteria | watchamadoodle | 58 | 14412 |
February 19, 2015 at 1:03 pm Last Post: Brian37 |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)