RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
March 24, 2017 at 10:43 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2017 at 10:47 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(March 24, 2017 at 10:28 am)MysticKnight Wrote: My argument is that what we love cannot be just the mask that others put or what we or others tell ourselves we are.Yes it can.
Quote: It has to be something real.No it doesn't.
Quote:And that who we are and judgment are interlinked.
Irrelevant.
Quote:Love depends on judgment.
Nope.
Quote:Take away REAL you, and what is love to love?
I am real me. Yes I have to exist to love. What is your point?
Quote:The subjective you created by a brain that has no authority on who you truly are, neither to judge, neither to order you?
Anyone who knows me well is an authority on who I am.
Quote:Are in love with real "who" of people, even though, we may not know it fully or even have false conceptions of them, or are win love with simply with subjective judgement that has no objective basis?
What does that even mean?
And love objectively exists as a subjective emotion in the brains of subjects. Love is just brain chemistry and the experience of those chemicals is experienced subjectively because ALL experience is subjective... but although the brain chemicals that we call "love" are EXPERIENCED subjectively those brain chemicals THEMSELVES exist objectively just as all subjects are also objects (just not all objects are subjects (like all dogs are animals but not all animals are dogs)).
Quote:Love as I said many times, proves, we know we have exact value. It's our most foundational essence to who we are, and what we know.
Love doesn't prove anything. It's just an emotion like any other and so what if we value it? We value other emotions too. That proves nothing.
It's not our foundational essence. We don't have a foundational essence.
