To all of us posting in this thread, there seems to be a general feeling of: Use common sense when deciding who is and who is not crossing the line into threatening behavior and if you're going to error, error on the side of freedom of speech - which of course I agree with. Unfortunately, and I can't speak for british law, but the US government has absolutely no common sense. None.
Well because of this obvious fact, they have to draw hard fast lines that are all too often non-negotiable ... and that is my fear. That in order to safeguard the public, freedom of speech takes hit after hit until it's more of a memory than a right.
Well because of this obvious fact, they have to draw hard fast lines that are all too often non-negotiable ... and that is my fear. That in order to safeguard the public, freedom of speech takes hit after hit until it's more of a memory than a right.
![[Image: Evolution.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk619%2Fjcincain%2FPublic%2FEvolution.png)
