(September 18, 2018 at 3:36 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Yes, the person is now known. Which is good, if this is going to proceed. However that's not where it started. Especially when I have made arguments to absurdity, that have gotten pretty absurd, and people here still says that witness testimony is not evidence. Which the inconsistency was the point of this. That the same arguments used to say that the testimony of scripture is not evidence, seem to think otherwise here.
Again, the only person calling the mere accusation 'evidence' is you. And we've been over outside corroboration and cross-examination before, I'm not going to go over it again because I don't believe you've actually forgotten that discussion.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.