Uni Health Care

[dry land fish]

I don't know how anyone can say "oh well, too bad" to a child dying of cancer who's only mistake was being born to a family that can't afford healthcare.

Well maybe not. It has to be ran past DLFish first as she's in charge of deciding who lives and who dies. I believe children with cancer would come under her "free treatment" program. Or maybe all children. Or was it only the children of NOT lazy fucks? Unless that mother has 6 other kids, then she falls into the "baby-factory-vagina" and the child is denied healthcare. Or was it the mother is just denied pre-natal care but the unhealthy babies this may produce get the health-care?

I forget who gets what under her system. Too many variables.

I'm not trying to decide who lives and who dies. How can anyone think that it's fair to take money from people to give it to other people? That's what taxes do already. Imagine getting paid cash at the end of your work day. Your employer hands you a hundred bucks for your eight hours. Then he says "oh well by the way I'm taking sixty dollars of your money to go to the schools, county roads, SSDI, SSI, and then to give to people who are too poor to afford health insurance, food, clothing, and other basic needs. That's what taxes are and we don't need those taxes that give money to poor people. If they didn't work for it then they don't get it. I'm not rich but I'm also not on food stamps or state assistance. I do NOT want to give my money that I earned to people who don't have any money. They need to find a job or do something for money besides take money from those who have a job. They could start by not having children they can't afford!! Wouldn't that be the smart thing to do? If someone has a child and they get cancer and they die then it happens. Just because they are a child we are supposed to feel bad? That's the way it is. We live and we die and some of us don't live as long as others. I'd never expect anyone to pay for my cancer. As a matter of fact most peoples high end health insurance policies don't even cover cancer. Now the tax payers are supposed to cover it? NO NEW TAXES. We are taxed enough already.

What's all this argument over Libertarianism? It's pretty simple. If it doesn't concern us or take our EARNED money then we don't give a damn. For example Libertarians are:
Pro Marijuana Legalization for personal use. We don't care if someone smokes until they pass out as long as they leave us alone.
Pro Prostitution. We don't care how many hookers somone pays for or who decides to be a hooker as long as they leave us alone.
Pro Abortion. Again...we don't care how many people abort their pregnancies as long as they leave us alone
Anti Taxes...we would like to keep our money that we worked for.
Pro whatever religion as long as they mind their own business and leave us the hell alone.

Get the pattern? We don't care about ANYTHING as long as it's not harmful to anyone other than the person who is doing it. We feel that people should be able to make their own decisions and we promote responsible decision making. That's why we are anti welfare. It's just not responsible for people who can't afford kids to have them and then live off of taxpayers. They need to keep working their Mc jobs and be childless or get an education, get a good job, and then reproduce. Maybe we are A- holes...but at least we mind our own business and contribute to the system instead of sponge off of everyone else. A Libertarian is likely to have a neighbor that's growing pounds of Marijuana or making meth and not say anything to anyone...because it's not any of our business as long as they don't bother us with their operation. I think we need more Libertarians because we mind our own damn business

Here is the link to the party. http://www.lp.org/

If you want to know what we are about then go there.