I made it through about 25 minutes or so as Eric tried to shove the burden of proof on Tfoot and use the Waldork "nyth nyth you don't know everything therefore Jesus" argument.
In my opinion, Tfoot is not well equipped to deal with the philoso-babble of Creationists on the fly mainly because he seems to give them way too much credit. Patiently trying to explain science or chemistry to someone like Eric Hovind is like trying to explain a submarine to a goldfish.
It would have been better to cut to the chase and say, "Yes, I admit I don't know everything" and let the feeble presuppositional nonsense begin.
In my opinion, Tfoot is not well equipped to deal with the philoso-babble of Creationists on the fly mainly because he seems to give them way too much credit. Patiently trying to explain science or chemistry to someone like Eric Hovind is like trying to explain a submarine to a goldfish.
It would have been better to cut to the chase and say, "Yes, I admit I don't know everything" and let the feeble presuppositional nonsense begin.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
