RE: Negative reputation?
September 8, 2012 at 9:35 am
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2012 at 9:40 am by Phish.)
(September 8, 2012 at 8:10 am)5thHorseman Wrote: If you want more reps, tell everyone you're a female liberal/socialist/anti war that dislikes Obama and loves seperation of church and state.
Easy wins are easy.
I saw this a female here got many reps just because she is a girl.
i was a socialist before it was cool.
Also im not looking for reputation its only a number that Tiberius gave it meaning,...
(September 8, 2012 at 9:31 am)Napoléon Wrote:(September 8, 2012 at 7:29 am)Tiberius Wrote: You can't compare yourself to them after a week.
Pssshhh IKR, who does this guy think he is
I actually voted yes in the poll. Even though I 100% get why we don't have it, I still voted yes for the principle of being able to give negative rep if we are able to give positive. But my ideas for why it would be used are only in an ideal world, and not likely to happen in actuality. I know that if we were given the option to give negative rep it would be abused and it would create unneeded forum drama and a negative vibe.
Still, in an 'ideal' world, negative rep could (I think) still be used in a positive and constructive way. People who did receive negative rep would potentially make a conscious effort to improve themselves.
But fuck if that would actually happen.
But still neutral rep could be added,we can tell members we dont like them,and we still wount change their rep.