Genkaus,
Refutation means to prove something is wrong. Could you restate how you refuted (proved wrong) the conclusion I have drawn from three lines of evidence thus far?
1. The existence of the universe.
I assume you agree the universe does exist. How did you refute (prove wrong) the possibility a transcendent Creator caused it to exist?
2. The existence of life
How did you refute (prove wrong) the possibility a transcendent Creator caused it to exist?
3. The existence of sentient life
How did you refute (prove wrong) the possibility a transcendent Creator caused it to exist?
If you actually did prove that some cause other than God or at least proved it wasn't God who caused the existence of these things I will agree you have proved your case.
By the way, I asked you last time if in your mind its an irrefutable fact God doesn't exist or is it a belief God doesn't exist?
Quote:Why would that stop me from reminding the 'jury' that your arguments are wrong and have been refuted?
Refutation means to prove something is wrong. Could you restate how you refuted (proved wrong) the conclusion I have drawn from three lines of evidence thus far?
1. The existence of the universe.
I assume you agree the universe does exist. How did you refute (prove wrong) the possibility a transcendent Creator caused it to exist?
2. The existence of life
How did you refute (prove wrong) the possibility a transcendent Creator caused it to exist?
3. The existence of sentient life
How did you refute (prove wrong) the possibility a transcendent Creator caused it to exist?
If you actually did prove that some cause other than God or at least proved it wasn't God who caused the existence of these things I will agree you have proved your case.
By the way, I asked you last time if in your mind its an irrefutable fact God doesn't exist or is it a belief God doesn't exist?