RE: Attn: Christians, We've Heard Them Already
June 7, 2013 at 2:27 pm
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2013 at 2:28 pm by Mystical.)
(June 7, 2013 at 8:59 am)John V Wrote:(June 6, 2013 at 5:08 pm)missluckie26 Wrote: I didn't say you were right did I? Nope.Of course not. You're defending the atheist despite the clear evidence.
Really? I thought he was a deist. No? Diest stemming from the word Deus, derived from the Latin word for god. I'm new to the whole categorization scene but I'm pretty sure if he believes in a god he's more on your end of the stick than mine.
Where pray tell, on this site, do you propose he go to avoid such nonsense?
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.