Hi Lion
1) A singularity isn't 'something out of nothing'. Get a textbook.
2) The whole purpose of having a null hypothesis is so that candidate explanations can be properly tested against a defined standard. It's serves to make the whole process robust. Again - kindly go and learn about proper scientific methods if you can't see how that's preferable to just saying "I know how it all came about Goddiddit phew now I feel better". Stop being silly.
I mean, by all means propose the god idea as a H1 hypothesis, and provide evidence to support it. Why are the theists in this thread so reluctant to do that? Surely, if it's true beyond doubt as you seem to think it is, then you'll have no difficulty providing evidence that a daft atheist on the internet such as me will be unable to evade?
Or is the problem that you have no evidence?
1) A singularity isn't 'something out of nothing'. Get a textbook.
2) The whole purpose of having a null hypothesis is so that candidate explanations can be properly tested against a defined standard. It's serves to make the whole process robust. Again - kindly go and learn about proper scientific methods if you can't see how that's preferable to just saying "I know how it all came about Goddiddit phew now I feel better". Stop being silly.
I mean, by all means propose the god idea as a H1 hypothesis, and provide evidence to support it. Why are the theists in this thread so reluctant to do that? Surely, if it's true beyond doubt as you seem to think it is, then you'll have no difficulty providing evidence that a daft atheist on the internet such as me will be unable to evade?
Or is the problem that you have no evidence?