(October 10, 2013 at 7:53 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:(October 10, 2013 at 7:40 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: The null hypothesis is not always we do not know.
When you're approaching the topic from complete ignorance, yes it is. guessing is just that; guessing. Depending on the topic at hand, there is a statistical probabilty you are 100% correct. However, given the almost infinite chances that you are wrong, the probability is somwhere close to 0%.
(October 10, 2013 at 7:40 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Life forms with vast complexity exist. They came into being somehow.
Somehow. I agree.
(October 10, 2013 at 7:40 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: The vast complexity of life means someone with vast intelligence and power created life, aka God the Creator. That is very much in keeping with scientific observation of intelligent design.
FALSE.
There, you've just done it! You've made an assertion based on nothing but an argument from ignorance fallacy. Congratulations on proving my point.
(October 10, 2013 at 7:40 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: So the null hypothesis, H0, is that God created all things.
Only if you're insane, Grace. You're not insane, are you?
Don't answer that.
(October 10, 2013 at 7:40 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Your hypothesis, H1, is that the vast complexity of life came into being without intelligence, a very radical theory since there is no evidence for it.
P(H1) = 0 or approximately 0 based on simple statistics.
Don't me LOL. 'Simple statistics'?
You're dealing with something that is anything but simple, and casually dismissing it as though someone were asking you to point to the number 1 on a piece of paper that has a large '1' in font size 1000. 'Radical theory'? More or less radical than your particular version of whatever god it is you worship beginning everything? You're making me LOL, Grace. I warned you not to do that.
and, FYI, my null hypothesis is that 'we don't know'. There could well indeed be something that seeded life. I haven't rejected that outright. But I reject your claims based on no evidence aside mere assertions and arguments from ignorance on your part.
Do you get the difference? Probably not. What year in school are you in?
Your null hypothesis is you do not know, not we.
Sorry, simple knowledge is that intelligently designed things are created by an intelligent being.
You are blind.
BTW The use os belittling and name calling proves you do not have any facts sir.
And since YOU do not know, your opinion is rendered useless.