I believe 9/11 was an inside job now

[FallentoReason]

I've read the article you linked Min in closer detail. There's some things that aren't adding up to me:


The AE911Truth team stated that it was the American Society of Civil Engineers themselves that violated the usual procedure of investigating a collapsed building. If this is true, then it puts the post-research they did into question.

Do they have evidence that they violated procedure and if so what type of procedure are we talking about? Violating protocol doesn't necessarily mean that the results have to be forfeited, sometimes exceptions have to be made and I'll assume WTC was a special case when it comes to investigation.

The video shows what procedures they violated. From memory, it was to do with the unprofessional treatment of the rubble, which is usually inspected.

---

Ok, I haven't watched your video or followed any other link posted here, but may I just point out one thing?

Let's say for the sake of argument (a ludicrous one, but still) that somehow it was a conspiracy, an inside job. Don't you suppose, with all the planning, care, secrecy, skill and general .007-ness employed to get the job done, they would have named the right "villain?"

I mean, presuming the whole thing was done as a pretext to go to war with Iraq, don't you imagine they would have named Saddam Hussein as the author of the act -- and not Osama bin Laden? Because... they sure had to work hard to shift the focus from bin Laden to Hussein in the run up to the war. Frankly, I was shocked they pulled THAT off.

Just an observation.

I wouldn't even know.. like I implicitly said in the OP, I'm just treating this as an isolated event with the primary focus being on how exactly the buildings came down.