(November 3, 2013 at 9:15 pm)snowtracks Wrote: so we have this situation: naturalism is propounding the idea that without a blueprint, that the eye was assembled, likewise the brain; each assembled independent of the other. then the idea came up - that it would be good to connect them with an optic nerve. then some backing and filling took place to get the focus correct. in the meantime, it was decided that chemicals and blood would be needed to supply the energy and that was hook-up.
So, you're a goddamn idiot: the evolution of the eye is amazingly well mapped, from simply light sensitive cells, through to a cupped proto-socket to allow for directional light, and so on and so forth. And of course the brain came first, but you seem to have this idiotic idea- befitting your status as an arrogant moron- that both evolved instantaneously, separately, and within a single organism. As I've mentioned multiple fucking times, across multiple fucking threads, these changes are gradual, and occur within the framework of the changes that have come before; it's not whoosh, brain, whoosh, eye, whoosh connection between the two.
Maybe you could actually fucking know what you're talking about next time, before you start spouting your mouth off like a goddamn fool?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!