(November 4, 2013 at 8:24 pm)snowtracks Wrote: this one seems angry about something.
Ah shit, now you done fucked up.
You wanna know why I was angry? It's because of the utter confidence with which you posted, when the entirety of your post just showed, glaringly, that you hadn't bothered to spend even a single second looking at what mainstream science has to say about the eye and its evolution before you decided you were knowledgeable enough to deride the theory. It's just emblematic of the utter, banal arrogance of creationists, who feel like education is second to simply believing something hard enough.
You bitch about responses of substance, yet you won't even bother to go and research the substantive body of evidence and study on this topic? That's what pisses me off, you ignorant tool.
Quote:since i posted, haven't really seen any cogent rebuttal argument from the atheist who like portray themselves as the 'intellectual ones'.
That's because the actual science that backs us to the hilt is plenty rebuttal. In fact, I listed, in brief, a few of the stages of ocular evolution in the post you quoted. What's your excuse now?
Quote:must be something to what i posted since it's appear "she's protesting too much". beginning to think, must be a philosophy that's being protected since no one is stepping forward to explain how those busy little molecules, like bees buzzing around, just want to seek and achieve greater complexity.
Who says anything about complexity? Life forms lose things via evolution just as often as they gain them. This is true of humans, too; our appendix had some use in the past, and look at it now. Our little toes used to be load bearing toes in the past, now they carry no weight at all. Whales evolved from land animals that returned to the sea, if you're categorizing all of this on some kind of ladder.
Tell you what, snowy: why don't you let us in on your process, here? Why not tell us of the hours of study into evolution that you've done, in order to discover so many holes in it? I mean, obviously you wouldn't be so shitfaced arrogant to decide something is wrong without actually knowing what it is, would you?
Please, tell us the mainstream, peer reviewed scientific texts you studied to come to your conclusions! Show us the sources that claim that all of evolution is a march toward complexity exclusively. Let us see the scientists that are baffled by the evolution of the eye.
You must have them, right?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!