Really? And how far up your ass did you have to reach to pull that one out? The dispute for the longest time was an argument that Matty was first rather than Mark but that idea has been dropped. You are the first person who has ever claimed that luke was first. This should be good.
PS, I don't give a shit about Josephus' fanciful description of the temple fire. The claim made was that jesus said not one stone would remain on top of another. This did not happen in 70. The burned out shell of the building remained. The "prophecy" came true in 135 when the Romans leveled the site to build Aelia Capitolina.
And no, before you say it I think prophecy is a pile of shit. Whatever bozo cobbled this "gospel" together knew full well that ancient Jerusalem had been leveled and put those words into your godboy's mouth to impress generations of fools.
PS, I don't give a shit about Josephus' fanciful description of the temple fire. The claim made was that jesus said not one stone would remain on top of another. This did not happen in 70. The burned out shell of the building remained. The "prophecy" came true in 135 when the Romans leveled the site to build Aelia Capitolina.
And no, before you say it I think prophecy is a pile of shit. Whatever bozo cobbled this "gospel" together knew full well that ancient Jerusalem had been leveled and put those words into your godboy's mouth to impress generations of fools.
