(March 13, 2014 at 1:01 am)snowtracks Wrote: the production of a new animal species in nature has yet to be documented; specifically, that means biologist in real time over the last 150 years have not been able to observe the entire sequence of one species being transformed into another kind.
Oh? That's not what the science says. Scroll down to, say, 5.3 on down.
Now, of course you used "kind," which means you're being dishonest from the outset; kind has no scientific definition and creationists refuse to define it either, so that they can expand and contract the definition as needed for their horrible little shell game. It is because of this that I'm declaring, right now, that any kind-based claim you make will be disregarded, and replaced in my mind with the words "I, snowtracks, am a dishonest fuckwit."
You will use a proper, scientifically accurate definition of evolution, or you will be labelled a moron who doesn't understand what he's talking about. We who actually understand evolution have no need to cater to the insipid fantasies of those who don't; get it right, or get the fuck out.
Quote:Man was created by God on the sixth and final day of creation so God won't be doing that either.
Oh look, a stupid assertion from a christian? I never!
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!