World's Oldest Christian Church discovered in Jordan!!

[Kyuuketsuki]

There is no suggestion (no validatable evidence) that he was EVER physical!!!! Pay Attention!

That is not a very strong arguement. Do you know why early first century Christians had to flee into Jordan in the first place?

Non sequitur!

It's YOUR claim, you do the #&%@ research!!!!

I did the research, and I found out that Christians are executed, and or deported from Jordan. I highly doubt Jordan's leading archaeologist is a Christian believer. http://www.crosswalk.com/news/religiontoday/11570428/

Adrian has already demonstrated that your Hassan was in fact a Christian (converted 12 years ago) therefore it is reasonable to assume he may have had a pro-Christian agenda.

As a matter of personal policy I don't do theist URL's, they are always a disappointment, they always waste my time.

Archaeologists have evidence that atheists are becoming more convinced that Jesus was real? Shit man ... those archaeologists are something aren't they?

Yup, for hundreds of years we had to hear atheists tell us, "Jesus is imaginary." This cave says "Not so much!"

I repeat, I restated your assertion that archaeologists have evidence that atheists are convinced Jesus Christ was real as a question then noted (somewhat cynically) that those archaeologists were something! For the terminally stupid amongst us I will explain ... they are archaeologists, they investigate archaeological sites and they don't give a flying fig what atheists think so your argument is a non-sequitur. Pay attention!

I never said he was! Pay Attention!

Doesn't matter if Jesus was there or not. The bottom line is, we have found evidence to believe this site was a worship ground for Jesus of Nazereth. Did you research the artifacts that were discovered?

It's YOUR claim, you do the #@%$ing research!

Your words, "The evidence has been exposed" & "People, it's a proven fact that a man called, 'the Christ' existed in the first century."

The evidence lays within the cave. What would the author of the Harry Potter books say if she found out Harry Potter was being worshipped 30 years ago?

You asked where you said it was evidence, your own words exposed that you did ... pay attention!

Referring to Harry Potter books over a claim of religious worship nearly 2000 years before the author was born is what we would call a strawman, it is irrelevant to the point being made.

Not in the slightest bit interested in talking to him certainly not until you provide some evidence to back up your claim.

Talk to the man who made the claim. I've seen the evidence. it's time for you to do your own homework.

I repeat, it's YOUR claim, do your own #@:&%ing research! .

Kyu