(May 19, 2014 at 8:14 pm)snowtracks Wrote:(May 19, 2014 at 11:09 am)Tonus Wrote: What??? A Christian using a single source that's out-of-date?no postings to refute it, so it stands, proudly.
So does my earlier comment about reading one source being easier than reading a bunch of hard ones.
You know what refutes this paper concisely?
His credentials, his agenda, and the fact that in the 15 years since the paper was written, it has contributed absolutely nothing to biology, medicine, or evolutionary theory whatsoever.
Quack like your source, Snowballs!
Quack, Quack!