RE: An unorthodox belief in God.
June 10, 2014 at 11:36 am
(This post was last modified: June 10, 2014 at 11:42 am by Mister Agenda.)
(June 10, 2014 at 8:51 am)mickiel Wrote: Please, don't try to manipulate an association between me and a hell monger. I am not Christian, mainly because I reject over 70& of their doctrines, this insane eternal hell torture is one of them, and atheist being condemned is another. Every atheist who ever lived and died was covered by the death of Christ, their salvation is based on that, not their predestined rejection of god.
I don't have much quarrel with Universalists usually, they're a nice bunch. Just noting that what makes someone a Christian is belief in the teachings of Jesus and that Jesus was the son of God or God incarnate whose blameless sacrifice gives salvation. Given over 30,000 denominations, pretty much everything else is up for grabs. So it's that part you should not believe if you're not a Christian.
(June 10, 2014 at 8:51 am)mickiel Wrote: I will deal with him myself. I got just as much in store for him, if he can take it, as I do for the atheist here. I am guessing the atheist here are strong enough to take it, because I am going to bang harder each week; I noticed some of you are bowing out already;
You'll see more of that as the boredom sets in.
(June 10, 2014 at 8:51 am)mickiel Wrote: can't say I blame you, some of you can sense what's coming;
Yeah, more spamming and trolling.
(June 10, 2014 at 8:51 am)mickiel Wrote: but first I am going to cripple you're often used shield of " Give me proof and evidence", you're get out of conversation, ( or jail card free), rehearsed request , that when given, you get lame about and use it again anyway; thinking all proof must be scientific, when all proof is no such limited thing.
It's actually how we get into conversation. We've gotten a lot of theists through here, but you're unique in your complete inability comprehend what an actual honest discussion should be like. Others show at least transient glimpses of awarenes and offer something that could possibly go somewhere, but you seem to be incapable of that.
(June 10, 2014 at 8:51 am)mickiel Wrote: And I am going to go into that.
Yeah, we never get people coming through here braggin' about what they're gonna do. You're a special snowflake.
(June 10, 2014 at 8:51 am)mickiel Wrote: My name is Michael Lesueur, email is listed on site, I post only under the name Mickiel; I need no alter ego to get this truth out. I believe in being for real.
I think you believe in being for real, but I don't think you know how.
(June 10, 2014 at 8:51 am)mickiel Wrote: You just get ready, because I am going to seriously push your trump card defense of asking for proof, asking for things that when you get it, you are pre primed to reject it any way.
Sure you are.
(June 10, 2014 at 11:24 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Anyone who holds a belief that one religious text takes precedence over another does not fit in this category.
Which was my original point. It's not his belief in God that makes him religious, it's his beliefs about God.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.