10 Questions Every Christian Needs To Answer.

[Neo-Scholastic]

Careful Chad, your comparisons are absurd (hope you get the joke).

Awesome!

...claiming they're [my philosopher list] challenging doesn't really get you anywhere. Kant, Hegel and Wittgenstein can be considered challenging, but what of it?

I didn't mean challenging in the sense of difficult to parse. I meant challenging to the Christian faith.

Regardless of his opinion about god, Dawkins is a preeminent evolutionary biologist.

There's not 'regardless'. He should stick to biology, because his theology is childish.

Hitchens is the greatest polemecist in the language since Mencken.

That puts Hitchens in the same category as Protagorus. There is a deep chasm between rhetoric and philosophy.

As a percentage, I would be willing to wager more atheists have studied Plotinus and Aquinus than believers.

I would actually take that bet if we included Catholic priests and seminary students.

...most believers couldn't tell you who Plotinus and Aquinus were.

I think you're right. If you totaled amount of dust collected on all the family bibles in the US you could top off several landfills. Then again, who's Mencken?