(November 22, 2014 at 10:55 am)His_Majesty Wrote:
You've missed the main point. You said you would prove that Jesus existed and then provided non-contempary sources mostly about Christians and not directly about Jesus. The one direct reference without reliance on the Christian cult has been tampered with. That is in no way proof.
However, the lack of complementary sources doesn't prove that there wasn't a Jewish man named Jesus who preached and was crucified.
Case unproven
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.