RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1)
November 25, 2014 at 7:30 am
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2014 at 7:33 am by GrandizerII.)
(November 22, 2014 at 11:11 am)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 22, 2014 at 5:09 am)Irrational Wrote: Yeah, but just because he's referred to doesn't mean that he must've existed.
Dude, what the hell are you talking about? All knowledge we have on historical figures are based on individuals that are "referred to".You sound like a damn fool.
(November 22, 2014 at 5:09 am)Irrational Wrote: Atheists may call you a follower of God. Does this mean they believe God exists?
Unfortunately, the point that you were trying to make is irrelevant...because I am not basing the sources of the Christians (necessarily)...I am basing it on the non-Christian sources mentioning or implications of Jesus as a historical figure.
But not all individuals referred to in historical sources must be historical figures.
Who's the damn fool now?
And, no, my point is relevant because atheists are non-Christian "sources" as well. Yet, they'll mention God when referring to someone as a believer in God. This does not mean they are implying God exists.
