RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 21, 2014 at 5:38 pm
(This post was last modified: December 21, 2014 at 5:43 pm by abaris.)
(December 21, 2014 at 5:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: The point of starting the thread was to sharpen my sword in this particular aspect of Christian apologetics...keeping the sword sharp...now whether or not you are convinced, I could care less, because it is obvious that you people don't give a shit about salvation OR Jesus Christ anyway.
Pretty dull sword still, isn't it. As far as apologetics go - I like that word, since it implies apologizing for something that can't be proven - you're certainly not the sharpest tool in the box.
And point taken, I don't give a single shit. Especially, if the arguments are coming from someone, who even refuses to look up scientific basics and presents criminal quacks like Howind as their heroes. That may be a big name where you're coming from, but here it's only another word for ignorance. And that's using a friendly word.
(December 21, 2014 at 4:37 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I'd like to move to part 3, but I need to know whether the forum God's are going to stretch out their almighty hands and fuck with my post for the simple fact that they don't have anything else to do on here besides watch me and find out ways they can limit my effectiveness.
Effectiveness in doing what exactly?