RE: The second law of thermodynamics and evolution
January 9, 2015 at 12:43 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2015 at 12:56 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(January 2, 2015 at 4:39 pm)king krish Wrote: -I've read that the law contradicts the evolution
-so i hope some one explain it for me
-i hope someone share links that explain it
-is there any videos about the second law of thermodynamics and evolution
-It doesn't. If thermodynamics worked the way people who think it disproves evolution think it does, life would be impossible.
-What is it with you and getting other people to find links for you? Google 'thermodynamics and evolution'.
-What is it with you and geting other people to find videos for you? Google 'why evolution does not contradict the second law of thermodynamics youtube''.
(January 2, 2015 at 5:09 pm)king krish Wrote:(January 2, 2015 at 5:02 pm)abaris Wrote: Creationist bullshit. I've googled it a moment ago. It's also been debunked a million times.
i want the links of this debunked a million times
That seems excessive. One link debunking it conclusively should be entirely adequate.
(January 2, 2015 at 5:15 pm)king krish Wrote: Here u r
Morris Henrifa the Scientific Creationism says: "The second law of thermodynamics in that everything seeks to chaos, which precludes the possibility for development(, which requires the pursuit of the organization )
Morris Henrifa is profoundly ignorant for someone who thinks they can lecture people on science. A schoolchild should know that the second law applies to closed systems, and earth is in an open system. It gets sufficient energy to drive life and evolution from the sun. The solar system as a whole is effectively closed, which is why the sun will eventually become a black dwarf in about 12 billion years and life as we know it in this planetary system will become impossible. In a hundred trilion years, all the stars will be 'out'. Beyond ten to the hundredth years, the universe will be reduced to an ever-thinning cloud of widely-spaced photons. But all that doesn't prevent local reversals of entropy where there's an energy differential to drive them. The second law wins in the end, but if it didn't allow simpler molecules to form into more complex ones, not only life, but much of chemistry would be out the window. Do you think it's more likely that pretty much every scientist in a relevant field missed that, or that Mr. Henrifa doesn't know about what he is talking?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
