(January 15, 2015 at 3:39 pm)Drich Wrote: Either way your highness, it is still a source that demands to be answered with stronger or more complete evidence.
No. You don't get to make assertions, whether they're yours or the arguments from ignorance of other sources, and then say they stand until someone disproves them. That's not how the burden of proof works; all of those sources present what is, at best, an unknown, and then assert that it's Noah's ark because they can spin the story to fit. But arguments from ignorance are just that, regardless of the source.
Quote:Just because you close your mind off to things you don't like to think about, it doesn't mean everyone else has.
... So when Aoi Magi posted a refutation on the first page, and when I presented a detailed explanation of why arguments from ignorance are not good evidence, and you maintained even after both of those things that all you've gotten from the atheists in this thread was "nuh uh," you think you were exhibiting an open mind?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!