(March 19, 2015 at 9:04 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Because it uses the word "kind" which is a synonym of "species", how many times must I link the definition?
If you actually think that, then it's kind of breathtaking that you've managed to find a way to use neither of those words accurately.
Quote:Not when we are discussing things in relation to the bible.
Which we weren't. We were discussing evolution, which isn't the bible. Quit trying to dishonestly force bad definitions onto good science; you can't just use a definition that wasn't considered in the definition of evolution, and then pretend that that definition was the one being used, that's ridiculous and dishonest.
And if you disagree with that, then I'm going to define "bible" as a large, spiked dragon dildo, and since now that word has that definition, that's therefore the only definition there ever was, so why are you wanting to discuss things in relation to large spiked dragon dildos, Huggy?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!