Ok, I haven't watched your video or followed any other link posted here, but may I just point out one thing?
Let's say for the sake of argument (a ludicrous one, but still) that somehow it was a conspiracy, an inside job. Don't you suppose, with all the planning, care, secrecy, skill and general .007-ness employed to get the job done, they would have named the right "villain?"
I mean, presuming the whole thing was done as a pretext to go to war with Iraq, don't you imagine they would have named Saddam Hussein as the author of the act -- and not Osama bin Laden? Because... they sure had to work hard to shift the focus from bin Laden to Hussein in the run up to the war. Frankly, I was shocked they pulled THAT off.
Just an observation.
Let's say for the sake of argument (a ludicrous one, but still) that somehow it was a conspiracy, an inside job. Don't you suppose, with all the planning, care, secrecy, skill and general .007-ness employed to get the job done, they would have named the right "villain?"
I mean, presuming the whole thing was done as a pretext to go to war with Iraq, don't you imagine they would have named Saddam Hussein as the author of the act -- and not Osama bin Laden? Because... they sure had to work hard to shift the focus from bin Laden to Hussein in the run up to the war. Frankly, I was shocked they pulled THAT off.
Just an observation.