RE: On the nature of evidence.
October 25, 2014 at 4:20 pm
(This post was last modified: October 25, 2014 at 4:21 pm by Anomalocaris.)
You pleaded for a greatly reduced standard of evidence for the existence of your pet deity compared to existence of just about anything a reasonable person would accept as real and disingenuously phrased it as a leading question.
You neglected to notice that 1. Reduced standard of evidence reduces the credibility of any proposition barely meeting that standard. 2. Using this reduced standard allows any other deity to be proven to the same standard, and thus reducing the believeability of your particular pet dirty which claims to be the only one even though new lowered standard of evidence esuggest there are many.
You neglected to notice that 1. Reduced standard of evidence reduces the credibility of any proposition barely meeting that standard. 2. Using this reduced standard allows any other deity to be proven to the same standard, and thus reducing the believeability of your particular pet dirty which claims to be the only one even though new lowered standard of evidence esuggest there are many.
