(November 21, 2014 at 10:41 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: This is like someone watching a 5 hour highlight session of Michael Jordan and saying "This same old fadeaway jumpshot: For fucks sake, you'd think that asshole would create a new move."
Sorry charlie, he will continue to shoot the same old fadeaway until the defense can learn to stop it.
See where I'm going with this?
You're going nowhere, fast, because your analogy fails. People didn't get tired of watching Jordan make his fade-away shots for the same reason they haven't tired of watching Manning throw touchdowns. They helped their respective teams win games. You, on the other hand, are re-hashing bullshit arguments based on tenuous (at best) historical arguments to "prove" something that cannot be proven to a bunch of people who don't give a fuck what you have to say about the subject.
You want to claim that "Jesus of Nazareth" was a real person, maybe you could start be proving (you know, using testable, verifiable evidence) that Nazareth was an extant community during your god-boy's alleged lfe (good luck). Then you need to prove that your god-boy was actually born, factual, not fictive. Again with testable, verifiable evidence.
Once you've managed that, then you get to try to prove the magic. That should be entertaining. Walking on water, feeding the multitudes, etc...
You have no physical evidence and no contemporary accounts, though I'm sure you'll try to throw shit at the wall in the vain hope that some will stick.
Something else to keep in mind before you start with the "no one's sure what happened that long ago" argument (something that frequently happens in these shit-fests), the first century CE is the best documented century in antiquity.
Have fun attempting the impossible. I'm sure many here will be amused by your lame attempts.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
