Awareness and Knowledge are different words that mean different things.
Someone can be aware of something behind their back without having knowledge of that thing.
Also, how do you propose someone differentiates between assumed awareness (say, of the existence of a deity) and actual awareness (say, of a person in the room)? At the moment your're saying "If I am aware of I know" without describing how awareness comes to be counted as knowledge and how you know your awareness is accurate.
Also, if you say that you "can only offer an argument as to why God(s) is improbable" then you do not KNOW that there is no god - Keep in mind, using terms colloquially in philosophy only causes problems.
To be honest it's probably better if you rethink your definition of knowledge anyway.
Someone can be aware of something behind their back without having knowledge of that thing.
Also, how do you propose someone differentiates between assumed awareness (say, of the existence of a deity) and actual awareness (say, of a person in the room)? At the moment your're saying "If I am aware of I know" without describing how awareness comes to be counted as knowledge and how you know your awareness is accurate.
Also, if you say that you "can only offer an argument as to why God(s) is improbable" then you do not KNOW that there is no god - Keep in mind, using terms colloquially in philosophy only causes problems.
To be honest it's probably better if you rethink your definition of knowledge anyway.
.
