RE: Logic 101
November 29, 2011 at 3:34 pm
(This post was last modified: November 29, 2011 at 3:35 pm by Welsh cake.)
Does anyone know what the fallacy of presenting the phenomena/place in question as "ontological proof" of any given supernatural being's existence is?
Like for example: "The Universe is proof of a God."
"The Forest is proof of Unicorns"
And so on...
Like for example: "The Universe is proof of a God."
"The Forest is proof of Unicorns"
And so on...