RE: Dilemma for theists!
March 29, 2012 at 2:49 am
(This post was last modified: March 29, 2012 at 2:58 am by Godscreated.)
(March 28, 2012 at 7:16 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: As I said G-C...small s socialism is caring for the vulnerable in ones society and as such xtianity IS SUPPOSEDLY SOCIALISTIC.
You numb nut!! You are advocating that your own religion be banned?? Is not caring for the poor and disenfranchised of concern to you or are you one of these tin pot "pretend christians" that mouth the words but are of no substance?? The poor are fine as long as YOU don't have to do anything about it?? Is this what YOUR religion is all about??
I thought better of you .... but obviously you are a very BAD example of the religion you strive so hard to promote...
You have no idea what I do to help others and as far as I'm concerned it's none of your business. Christianity is not socialistic, when we help others we ask for nothing in return, as a matter of fact we show up at disasters before most ask for help. I care very much about those who are not as fortunate as others. I'm not sure why you think I'm a bad example of christianity, I did not say anything about banning socialism or anything else. People have the right to live under whatever society they desire.
(March 28, 2012 at 2:49 am)padraic Wrote:Quote:China and Russia are socialist nations,
You REALLY don't have fucking clue,do you.
The soviet union ended was dissolved in december 1991. It had been a totalitarian dictatorship since 1917. Today Russia is run economically as laissez faire capitalism,but controlled by former-KGB thugs. (such as Putin)
China is not now and has never been a socialist state. Politically it remains a totalitarian dictatorship with SOME socialist aspects. However,today it lacks THE major criterium for a socialist state: Collective ownership of the means of production.
Quote:Socialism /ˈsoʊʃəlɪzəm/ is an economic system characterised by social ownership and control of the means of production and cooperative management of the economy,[1] and a political philosophy advocating such a system. "Social ownership" may refer to any one of, or a combination of, the following: cooperative enterprises, common ownership, direct public ownership or autonomous state enterprises.[2] There are many variations of socialism and as such there is no single definition encapsulating all of socialism.[3] They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets versus planning, how management is to be organised within economic enterprises, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
Quote:go live there and see what you think.
What a sublimely stupid thing to say:
Australia has free speech,the US has the first amendment. That means we are free to criticise our own country and any other. You don't like that? What can I say except go fuck yourself you fascist prick.
Thanks for the definition, now how does that rule out China and Russia, they both have put up fronts to disguise their intentions, all they want to do is make claims about themselves that most of the world want buy. Of coarse Chavez and those like him are fooled, but hey their making their own bed and some day will have to lay in it.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.