The Case for Theism

[Cyberman]

Not quite - "according to atheists" there isn't any phenomena or event that requires an invisible, magic creator which can only be defined as a "god".

And this is because they have naturalistic explanations and models that account for the existence of the universe and life?

No, because the burden of proof is on the person proposing the existence of the entity extra to the "naturalistic explanations" that already account for observed reality.

Please put this debate to bed once and for all and tell me about these verified theories.

What debate would this be, then? Because I can promise you I haven't mentioned any such thing. Presumably this is another of those extraneous entities thirsting for justification.

Or more accurately, the creator that is usually proposed has still, after all these centuries, to be even demonstrated as something that exists in reality.

I agree, the existence of a Creator is an opinion. I am making a cogent case from facts that support that belief.

You're attempting a case, to be sure, but cogency is for the audience to decide.